Wednesday, May 2, 2007

Thoughts on Debate

I've just finished watching the majority of tonight's debate, so I thought I would finally comment. First of all, Royal did a much better job during most of the debate itself in terms of TV behavior. Each candidate naturally repeated the same propositions that we have heard throughout the campaign, but Sarkozy was noticeably looking at the table or at the moderators, where as Royal was always looking intently across the table at Sarkozy.

Nevertheless, the conclusions gave me the reverse impression. Sarkozy either wear's his heart on his sleeve or is an excellent actor, for whenever he talks about the value of work and his intent to act, he comes across convincingly and charismatic. Royal, on the other hand, easily slipped into her "mother of four" speech, which ended up sounding trite and scripted.

Overall, this will lead voters to make up their minds only by reinforcing already established impressions. Neither candidate really stood out for the better or worse, which by default will hurt Royal. In tomorrow's Washington Post the article on the debate highlights Royal's instant of "anger" as a decisive moment.

In front of millions of television viewers, Sarkozy turned the tables. Royal got furious when he started talking about handicapped children, saying he was "playing" with the issue. "I am very angry," she said.

"You become unhinged very easily, Madame," said Sarkozy. "To be president of the republic, one must be calm. ... I don't know why Mrs. Royal, who's usually calm, has lost her calm."

If this becomes the defining moment of the debate, it could very well damage her, although I doubt it will do either. You can watch the interchange here. Watching it one starts to get flashbacks to that 1993 debate between the two, when a younger Segolene Royal refused to allow Sarkozy to interrupt her. It's reassuring to know that despite the differences in circumstances, they haven't much changed.

Technorati tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,


Name: Alex Moronda said...

bend over backwards much?

Royal won this debate. It's clear as day. Sarkozy came off well, too, but she came off as a President.

Despite the much-uttered refrain that the two candidates are nothing special I think it has become clear that France has two really great people as candidates and that no matter who wins their next President will be capable, intelligent and motivated to pursue their vision for the nation going forward.

Boz said...

Well I'm glad you're optimistic, I would say that I am too. As I said, Segolene definitely performed better during the debate, but I thought her closing statement was weak.

Da Weaz said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Da Weaz said...

As I said in an earlier post, I don't think Sego's performance helped her. My thoughts appear to have been confirmed:

I am hoping for a miracle. But it will take a miracle.